Casinos That Accept iDEAL in the UK: Payment Guide

iDEAL options can vary by market, currency and account, while deposits, withdrawals, bonuses and verification follow separate conditions.

What “Accepts iDEAL” Means for UK Casino Payments

“Accepts iDEAL” sounds like a simple label. In practice, it can describe several different things: a payment logo shown on a general banking page, a method available only in certain countries, or an option that appears in the cashier after an account has been opened. Those are not equivalent.

For UK casino payments, the meaningful test is whether iDEAL is displayed as an available deposit method in the account’s live cashier, with the transaction currency and customer details accepted at that point. A logo elsewhere on the site is only an indication that the payment service may be supported somewhere within the operator’s wider network.

That distinction matters because payment arrangements are not static. A remote gambling licensee may use one cashier configuration for one market and another for a different jurisdiction. The same brand can also show different options according to currency, account status, location, or the payment provider connected to that cashier. A page describing “the best casinos that accept iDEAL” therefore cannot establish availability by wording alone.

Advertisement and cashier are different tests

I have seen payment pages treated as if they were transaction screens. They are not. A marketing page can list cards, bank services, wallets or other payment brands while the actual deposit page presents a shorter selection. A method can also be technically supported by a payment processor without being enabled for every customer.

The practical meaning of an iDEAL claim is therefore conditional:

• the casino must display iDEAL in the active cashier;
• the option must be available for the account’s country and currency;
• the payment provider must accept the transaction details;
• the method must remain available when the deposit is initiated, not merely appear in general site information.

No single label proves all four points.

This is why broad phrases such as “all iDEAL casinos in the UK” are misleading when read as a complete market list. Availability can change without the brand’s general payment page being rewritten immediately. It is also possible for a review to describe a method observed at one point while the current cashier has changed. The current transaction screen carries more weight than a banner, comparison table or old payment article.

What the method tells us — and what it does not

iDEAL is a branded bank-payment route. Its appearance in a cashier would indicate that the operator and its payment arrangement are presenting that route for the relevant account. It would not, by itself, establish that every UK account can use it, that every bank is eligible, or that the option will remain visible for a later transaction.

Nor does the phrase identify a particular standard of casino, a bonus, or a catalogue of games. Searches for the best iDEAL casinos, new casino sites supporting iDEAL, or an iDEAL casino bonus combine payment availability with separate questions about offers and gambling products. Those questions require their own checks. A payment logo cannot answer them.

The same applies to searches mentioning Android. An Android device does not turn an unavailable payment method into an available one. The payment decision is made by the casino cashier and its provider, not by the handset used to reach the account. The mobile interface may arrange the buttons differently, but it does not make a general advertisement conclusive.

Small wording differences matter. “iDEAL supported” may refer to the operator’s payment infrastructure. “Deposit with iDEAL” is more specific, but still needs confirmation in the live cashier. “Withdraw through iDEAL” is a separate claim and should not be assumed from a deposit option. Payment stages follow their own conditions.

Currency is part of the availability check

Currency is another detail hidden by a simple payment badge. Casino pages may describe GBP as supported, but the account currency still needs to be confirmed before the first transaction. If the account is set to another currency, conversion can be introduced even where the payment brand itself is displayed.

That makes the cashier a practical control point rather than a decorative list. It shows which route is enabled for the account and how the transaction is denominated. A payment method that appears on an information page but disappears when GBP is selected has not provided usable UK availability for that account.

The same caution applies to Visa and Mastercard. A specialist review may list those card brands among the payment methods associated with a casino, but current UK availability and the eligibility of a particular card product still need checking in the cashier. Card branding alone does not settle whether a transaction can proceed. UK-licensed casinos cannot accept credit-card payments for gambling, so the relevant question is whether the card product is permitted for that use, not merely whether it carries a familiar logo.

The clean description is therefore narrower than the advertising version: a casino accepts iDEAL for a UK account only when the method is actually presented and usable in that account’s current cashier, with the applicable currency and transaction conditions. Everything else is an indication to verify. That is the operational meaning.

Deposits, Withdrawals and the Original-Payment Rule

A casino cashier treats a deposit and a withdrawal as separate stages, even when they appear under the same payment brand. A method can be displayed as a way to fund an account without being available for receiving a payout. That distinction matters when assessing whether iDEAL can be used at a UK-facing casino: the relevant question is not only whether iDEAL appears among the deposit icons, but what the cashier permits when money is being withdrawn.

The transaction normally begins with a funding request. The account holder selects an available method, enters the amount, and completes any authentication required by the payment provider. Once the balance has been credited, a later withdrawal is handled under a different set of controls. The casino may have to establish that the account belongs to the customer, that the payment came from an acceptable source, and that the requested destination is permitted under its payment and anti-money-laundering procedures.

That is why a payment route should not be described as a complete deposit-and-withdrawal option unless both functions are confirmed. A deposit button alone proves only that the method can be used at that point in the cashier. It does not establish that winnings can be sent back through the same route.

Why the original source matters

UK anti-money-laundering controls commonly require a payout to be returned to the payment source used for the deposit. This is often called the original-payment rule. Its purpose is not to make the cashier deliberately awkward. It creates a traceable connection between the money entering the gambling account and the money leaving it, which helps reduce fraud and prevents the account from being used as an informal transfer channel.

The same principle applies when iDEAL is considered. If a casino accepts an iDEAL deposit but cannot return funds through iDEAL, it may direct the withdrawal to another permitted route. That alternative is not automatically interchangeable. The casino may ask for further checks before approving it, particularly where the destination does not match the original funding path.

The cleanest transaction record is generally one named account used consistently for deposit and withdrawal. Matching ownership details across the gambling account and payment account reduce the chance that basic information creates avoidable friction. A different name, an unfamiliar payment account, or a request to send funds to somebody else can cause the payment to be held while the operator establishes who owns the money and where it should go.

I have seen the wording “withdrawal available” used rather loosely in payment tables. In practice, it can mean that the operator supports a withdrawal method in general, not that it will be offered for every customer or every deposit history. The cashier is the operative document.

When another withdrawal route is proposed

A casino may return the deposited amount to the original source and handle any remaining balance through another approved route, subject to its own closed-loop rules and account checks. The exact sequence depends on the operator’s procedures and the payment provider’s capabilities. It should not be assumed that a customer can select any convenient bank account or wallet simply because that destination is visible in a withdrawal menu.

Additional verification can be required when funds are redirected. The operator may need evidence connecting the alternative account to the same person, or may request documents already associated with KYC. This is one reason a first withdrawal can take longer than a later one: internal approval and verification form part of the processing time, rather than the payment transfer alone.

A specialist review may describe first withdrawals as taking longer while checks are completed, but that timing is not a fixed rule for every UK casino or account. The useful point is procedural: a withdrawal request is not always sent immediately to the payment network. It can remain pending while the casino confirms identity, ownership and compliance information.

The distinction also explains why a fast deposit does not predict a fast payout. The incoming payment may be authorised by the provider almost immediately, while the outgoing request still needs casino approval. Those are different clocks, controlled by different parties.

Reading the cashier correctly

For a prospective iDEAL deposit, three separate questions should be kept apart:

• Is iDEAL listed as a deposit method for the relevant account?
• Is iDEAL also available for withdrawals, or is it deposit-only?
• If the payout must use another route, what ownership or KYC checks apply?

The first question concerns funding access. The second concerns the payment lifecycle. The third concerns the conditions attached to changing the route. Treating them as one question is how payment descriptions become misleading.

This also applies when comparing alternatives to iDEAL at UK online casinos. A card, bank transfer or wallet may be shown in both parts of a cashier, but that does not remove the need to inspect the account-specific instructions. The original-payment rule can still determine the order in which funds are returned and whether an alternative requires additional evidence.

The practical reading is straightforward: a deposit method is not necessarily a withdrawal method, and a withdrawal method is not necessarily available without checks. The payment trail matters.

Availability Depends on the Cashier and the Account

A payment logo on a casino page is not the same as a payment option available for every customer. The cashier is the operational point: it shows which methods can actually be selected for that account, in that currency and for that transaction. This is why a casino may appear to support a particular route while the option does not appear after registration.

That distinction matters for searches about iDEAL. A general payment page can describe a method without making it available to every UK account. Availability may depend on the casino’s payment provider, the account profile, the transaction being attempted and the product used to fund it. The practical answer is therefore found after signing in, opening the deposit cashier and checking the methods displayed there.

The same principle applies to debit-card searches. Visa and Mastercard are widely recognised card brands, but the brand alone does not establish that a particular card can be used for gambling deposits. A specialist review may list those networks among the methods shown by the websites it examined; that is useful background, not a substitute for the live cashier. UK availability and eligibility depend on the actual card product and must be confirmed at the point of payment.

Why the account changes the result

Cashiers are linked to individual accounts rather than operating as a universal menu for every visitor. A method can be visible in general site information yet unavailable once the account is opened. The displayed choice can also differ between a deposit screen and a withdrawal screen, so seeing a logo in one place does not establish that the route serves the entire transaction.

Account status is another practical factor. A casino may require account details to be in order before allowing a payment request to proceed. That does not turn a listed method into a guaranteed option; it means the cashier and the account work together. Payment compatibility is assessed in context.

I have seen avoidable delays begin with something more basic than the payment technology: the names and details do not line up. The cleanest arrangement is for the casino account and the payment account to belong to the same customer, with matching ownership information. Consistency gives the operator fewer basic discrepancies to resolve during a transaction.

That does not remove every possible check. It does reduce the chance that a mismatch over the account holder, cardholder or payment profile creates unnecessary friction before the transaction can be handled.

A practical cashier check

The useful sequence is short:

1. Sign in to the casino account rather than relying on a public payment-method page.
2. Open the deposit cashier and note the methods currently offered.
3. Check whether the chosen card or payment account is eligible, not merely whether its brand is displayed.
4. Confirm that the account details and payment ownership information correspond.
5. Review the withdrawal cashier separately instead of assuming that a deposit method can also receive funds.

This process answers the important question more accurately than a logo or review list. It also prevents a common mistake: treating a payment method as a permanent feature of the casino when it is actually conditional on the account and the transaction.

For iDEAL in particular, the cashier is the decisive checkpoint. The wording on a page may remain unchanged while payment arrangements evolve. An account-level display is closer to the real position, although it still reflects the transaction being set up at that moment.

One final distinction is worth keeping clear. A method being available does not mean that it qualifies for every promotion, supports every transaction type or avoids all verification steps. Those are separate conditions. The cashier establishes what can be selected; the account details establish whether the payment belongs to the correct customer. Small details, but they decide whether the route works.

Mobile Play Does Not Change the Payment Rules

A phone or tablet changes the way casino games are displayed, not the payment permissions attached to the account. A mobile casino page may open in a browser, adapt its layout to a smaller screen, and allow slots to run without desktop software. None of that makes iDEAL available automatically.

That distinction matters because “mobile slots” and “pay by iDEAL” describe two separate parts of the transaction. The first concerns the device and the game interface. The second concerns the cashier, the account, the payment provider and the casino’s current processing arrangements. A site can support mobile play while showing no iDEAL option at all. It can also display a payment logo on a general information page while the mobile cashier presents a different selection.

I have seen this confusion arise when a payment method is treated as a feature of a slot rather than of the casino account. Slots do not accept deposits independently. The casino cashier does. The balance created there is then used across the available games, whether the session takes place on a phone, tablet or computer.

“Mobile-friendly” is therefore a presentation claim, not a payment guarantee. It normally says that the website or game interface is designed to work on a mobile device. It does not confirm that a particular deposit route is active for a UK account, that the same route can be used for a withdrawal, or that it remains available after registration and account checks.

The practical check remains the same on a small screen:

• open the casino’s cashier rather than relying on a payment badge;
• review the deposit methods displayed for the specific account;
• check the terms attached to the selected route;
• confirm that the payment account and casino account belong to the same customer;
• avoid assuming that a method visible on a desktop page will appear in the mobile cashier.

A mobile browser may also hide options behind a menu, show only methods supported in the selected currency, or present a different layout from the full website. That is a display issue, not evidence that the method has been added or removed permanently. Account status can matter as well.

The same principle applies to searches for real-money slots, online slot machines or free-play versions associated with iDEAL. “Free” play does not create a deposit route, while real-money play still depends on the casino’s cashier and account controls. The game category and the funding method should be checked separately.

There is also a responsible-gambling control that remains relevant on mobile. UK remote gambling operators must prompt a new customer to set a financial limit before the first deposit and make account-level limit controls accessible. A compact mobile interface must not be treated as a reason to bypass or overlook that step. The controls may be located in the account area rather than beside the game itself, but their purpose is unchanged.

The cleanest way to assess mobile payment compatibility is to regard the phone as the screen and the cashier as the decision point. One does not replace the other.

UK Slot Play Rules

UK rules place specific controls on the design and pace of online slot play, including a ban on autoplay and minimum spin durations.

Spin duration

Online slot spins in Britain must last at least 2.5 seconds.

Stake limits

• Customers aged 18 to 24: maximum £2 per game cycle.
• Customers aged 25 and over: maximum £5 per game cycle.

Real-Money Slots and the UK Play Rules

Searching for real-money slots linked with iDEAL can make the payment method seem like the main decision. It is not. Once funds are in a gambling account, the play itself remains subject to the rules applying to online slots in Britain, regardless of whether the deposit came through a bank-linked service, a card, or another permitted route.

The first practical point is age and account access. A remote gambling licensee must verify a customer’s age before allowing a deposit into the gambling account. That check is separate from any payment authorisation. A payment going through does not replace the operator’s responsibility to establish that the account holder is old enough to gamble.

What counts as a permitted online slot session?

UK rules place specific controls on the design and pace of online slot play. Autoplay is banned. A session cannot be set to run spins automatically while the account holder simply watches the result. Each spin has to be initiated as an individual action.

Online slot spins in Britain must also last at least 2.5 seconds. This applies to the game cycle, not to the speed of a deposit or to the loading time of a casino site. A quick payment therefore has no bearing on how quickly successive slot outcomes may be presented.

That distinction matters because payment wording and game wording often sit close together in casino advertising. “Instant” may describe a deposit instruction or account crediting process; it does not authorise rapid-fire slot cycles. “Real money” identifies the account balance being used, not an exemption from the play controls.

Stake limits by age

The maximum stake for an online slot game cycle depends on the customer’s age:

• Customers aged 18 to 24: no more than £2 per game cycle.
• Customers aged 25 and over: no more than £5 per game cycle.

The £5 limit for adults came into force on 9 April 2025. These are maximum permitted stakes, not recommended amounts and not a promise that every casino or game will make the full amount available. A platform may apply tighter controls through its own account settings or financial-management tools.

The age bands are applied to the customer, not to the payment method. Using an iDEAL-linked route, a debit card, or another available option does not alter the stake ceiling. Nor does playing through a browser or a mobile interface change the rules governing the slot.

In operational terms, the cashier handles the movement of money; the game controls govern the way that balance can be used. Keeping those functions separate avoids a common misunderstanding: a payment route can make a deposit possible without making unrestricted slot play possible. The rules stay attached to the gambling activity.

No shortcut.

Deposit Speed Is Not Withdrawal Speed

A deposit and a withdrawal travel through different operational stages. A card deposit may appear in the balance immediately, while a payout can take several business days. The first transaction is an authorisation to add funds; the second requires the casino to release money after its own checks. The labels may sit beside one another in the cashier, but the processes are not mirror images.

Why is my withdrawal taking longer than my deposit?

Deposits are often authorised quickly, but withdrawals require additional casino approval, identity verification, and anti-money-laundering checks.

Can I use any wallet for bonuses?

Not necessarily. Many casinos exclude certain wallets, like PayPal or Skrill, from promotional eligibility even if they are available for deposits.

Does using a mobile phone change payment availability?

No. A mobile interface is just a different way to access the cashier; it does not change the payment permissions or methods attached to your account.

This is why an instant deposit via a banking service does not establish an instant payout. The payment route may be capable of moving money quickly, yet the casino still has to approve the withdrawal. Internal review can include checking the account, confirming the requested amount, and ensuring that the transaction meets the operator’s procedures. Until that stage is complete, the payment provider is not the only factor controlling the timetable.

What happens before a payout is sent

The first withdrawal can take longer when KYC has not been completed. An account may accept a deposit before every document or identity check has been finalised, but a payout can trigger a closer review. If the account is not fully verified, the withdrawal may wait while the casino completes its checks.

A specialist review identifies casino approval and account verification as key influences on withdrawal speed. That is a useful operational distinction, although it should not be treated as a fixed timetable for every cashier. A payment method marketed as “fast withdrawal” still depends on the operator’s internal queue.

In practice, the stages are separate:

1. The deposit is authorised and the balance is credited.
2. A withdrawal request is submitted.
3. The casino reviews the account and approves the request.
4. The payment provider processes the outgoing transaction.

The first stage can be immediate even when the later stages are not. That is the part promotional payment tables tend to compress into one word: “instant”.

Choosing a route for speed

A specialist review places PayPal, open banking services and debit cards connected to fast payout systems among the quicker withdrawal routes. The wording matters: these are payment routes associated with faster processing, not a promise that every casino will pay instantly through them. Availability, account verification and the casino’s approval process still govern the result.

For searches involving iDEAL deposits, direct withdrawals or instant banking, the practical issue is therefore not just how quickly funds enter the account. The withdrawal function must be available in the cashier, and the account must be ready for approval. A fast deposit proves only that the inbound transaction worked.

That difference is easy to miss. It is also where most timing expectations fail.

Bonuses and Payment-Method Conditions

A payment method can affect whether a promotion applies. That is separate from whether the method appears in the cashier or whether it can be used for a real-money deposit. A casino may display a welcome promotion broadly, then attach a payment clause that excludes particular wallets or funding routes.

This is where phrases such as “eligible deposit” need reading carefully. The condition may require a qualifying payment method, a minimum transaction, or the use of a specific promotional code. The relevant wording can also distinguish between a deposit that funds play and one that qualifies for the offer. “Welcome bonus” is therefore not a payment promise; it is a set of terms attached to a particular promotion.

The same applies to searches for iDEAL-supported slots sites and real-money casino play. An iDEAL deposit option, if shown in the account cashier, does not by itself establish eligibility for a bonus. The promotion rules decide that point. A method can be available for funding while excluded from the promotional calculation.

Wallet exclusions and bonus eligibility

A specialist affiliate review has reported that PayPal can be excluded from bonus eligibility even though it is valued for convenience and speed. That is a statement about the promotion condition, not a general rule for every remote gambling licensee. The current offer terms remain decisive.

The same caution applies to Skrill and Neteller. A specialist affiliate review describes these wallets as available at some sites while often being left outside promotional offers. “Often excluded” should be read as a warning to inspect the wording, not as proof that every offer treats them alike.

The practical distinction is simple:

• payment availability concerns whether a transaction can be initiated;
• bonus eligibility concerns whether that transaction satisfies the promotion;
• wagering conditions concern what must happen after the offer is accepted.

Those are separate checks. One does not replace the others.

A payment-method clause may also matter when a promotion advertises a bonus code or a no-deposit offer. A code can be valid but still subject to account, payment, or campaign restrictions. A no-deposit promotion does not turn every later deposit route into an eligible one, and a slot-focused offer does not remove the payment conditions attached to it.

From the operator side, these exclusions are not decorative wording. They identify transactions that the promotion is designed to recognise. My own rule is to read the payment paragraph before treating a displayed bonus as part of the account’s value.

Small print decides.

Minimum Deposits, Limits and Financial Controls

The entry point for an iDEAL deposit is not fixed across UK-facing casino cashiers. A specialist review places the starting minimum within the £10–£20 range, with the exact figure depending on the selected payment method. That makes a low-value option possible in some accounts, but it does not establish that every casino offering iDEAL will support a £5 deposit.

The important distinction is between a method’s minimum and the account’s overall transaction settings. A cashier may display a payment route but apply a different minimum once the account currency, customer profile or payment-provider rules are taken into account. The figure shown at the point of deposit is therefore more useful than a general payment-method description.

Maximums are just as variable. A specialist review notes that a casino may set limits per transaction, per day or per month, and that those limits can change according to the payment method and account status. A newly opened account may not have the same available ceiling as an established, fully assessed account. Payment-provider restrictions can sit alongside the casino’s own controls, so the lower limit may determine what can actually be deposited.

This is where searches for an instant iDEAL deposit or a mobile payment option can create the wrong expectation. A quick authorisation does not remove the cashier’s minimum or maximum, and using a phone does not create a separate set of financial limits. The transaction remains subject to the account and the selected route.

UK financial controls begin before the first deposit. UK Gambling Commission rules require remote gambling licensees to prompt a new customer to set a financial limit before money can be deposited. The account must also provide accessible controls for managing that limit later. This is an account-level safeguard, not a claim about the minimum accepted by iDEAL or any other payment service.

In practice, three figures should be kept separate: the payment method’s minimum, the casino’s transaction ceiling and the customer’s own financial limit. Confusing them is how a nominally available deposit route becomes unusable at checkout.

Small deposit, separate controls.

Comparing Payment Routes Without Assuming One Is Cheapest

The practical alternative to iDEAL depends on what the cashier makes available for the account and transaction. UK casinos commonly list debit cards, including Visa and Mastercard. Open banking and bank transfer are also used at some sites; a specialist review describes these routes as capable of providing instant deposits and fast withdrawals at many casinos. That is a description of reported availability, not a promise that every cashier will offer the same service.

Paysafecard works differently. It is a prepaid voucher and is deposit-only, so it should not be treated as a complete replacement where a matching withdrawal route is required. A payment method can solve the funding part of the transaction while leaving the payout to another process.

Other payment choices may include wallets and mobile-wallet services, but availability and conditions vary. Apple Pay is accepted for deposits by some UKGC-licensed casinos. Skrill is described as one of the common deposit methods at UK-friendly casino sites in a specialist review, while Jeton is reported as remaining available at a handful of UK online casinos in 2026. These statements describe particular market observations, not a ranking of routes.

Cost is equally dependent on the transaction. Possible charges include a casino fee, the payment provider’s fee, an issuer or bank charge, currency-conversion spread, and network cost. The visible flat fee is not the whole calculation: a conversion spread can cost more, particularly when the account currency and the payment route do not align.

The cleanest comparison is therefore made against the actual amount being deposited or withdrawn:

• whether the route supports the required transaction direction;
• any casino or provider charge;
• the exchange rate and conversion spread;
• possible bank, issuer or network costs;
• whether the account currency matches the payment route.

There is no universal lowest-fee option. Debit card, bank transfer, open banking, wallet and voucher routes each shift the cost and convenience balance in different ways. The cashier remains the decisive point.

Payment Security, Verification and Non-GamStop Searches

Payment security begins with ownership, not with the logo shown in a cashier. The cleanest arrangement is one named account used consistently for both depositing and withdrawing. Account details, payment details and identity documents then point to the same person. That alignment removes a basic source of friction before a transaction is reviewed.

A mismatch can change the character of a routine payment. A casino may ask for evidence of ownership, clarification of the funding source or further identity checks before releasing funds. The issue is not that a particular payment brand is inherently unsafe; it is that the account holder must be identifiable throughout the transaction.

The same principle explains closed-loop rules. Returning funds to the original payment source is a recognised anti-fraud and anti-money-laundering control. An alternative withdrawal route may be possible in some circumstances, but it can require additional verification. “Flexible withdrawals” does not mean that every route is interchangeable.

That distinction matters when iDEAL is mentioned alongside casinos described as not connected to GamStop. iDEAL is a payment method; GamStop status concerns self-exclusion arrangements and the operator’s regulatory position. One does not establish the other. A casino advertising a particular deposit route has not, by that fact alone, demonstrated that it is outside GamStop or that its protections match those of a UKGC-licensed remote gambling operator.

Offshore sites are separate from the UK regulatory system. They do not hold a UKGC licence, while remote gambling operators selling into the British market must hold the relevant Gambling Commission licence. A non-GamStop description therefore needs to be assessed as a licensing and player-protection issue, not treated as a convenient payment category.

From the payment side, the practical check remains narrow: the account and funding route should belong to the same customer, and any return of funds may follow the original source rather than the route that appears most convenient. From the regulatory side, licence status and self-exclusion protection are separate questions.

Two checks. Separate purposes.

What is the fastest withdrawal method for UK casinos?

PayPal, open banking and debit cards linked to fast payout systems are generally among the quickest options. The time also depends on the casino’s approval process and whether your account is verified.

Do UK casino withdrawals require verification?

Yes, verification may be needed, particularly before a first withdrawal. Payouts can take longer while the casino completes its checks.

Why must withdrawals return to the deposit method?

Returning funds to the original payment source is a common anti-fraud and anti-money-laundering control. Using another route may require extra verification.

Are fast casino withdrawals guaranteed?

No. Withdrawal speed depends on the casino’s approval process and your verification status; payment processing can also be affected by factors such as bank cut-off times and weekends.

Responsible Gambling

Prepared by the Casinoexitgamstop.com editorial staff.